Vivo X200vsSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
SETTLEDUpdated September 8, 2026
Vivo X200 wins
Verdict
Vivo X200 wins 2 of 5 categories — our overall pick
Vivo X200 is the overall winner, 2 / 5 — display is its standout. At USD 799, it's also the most affordable of this group.
- Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes Performance — led by performance score (2,200,000 pts).
- Vivo X200 takes Display — led by peak brightness (4,500 nits).
- Too close to call between Vivo X200 and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra.
- Too close to call between Vivo X200 and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra.
- Vivo X200 takes Price — led by price (799 USD).
Scores follow our published methodology · v2026.09
In plain English
Choose Vivo X200 if you want…
- Choose Vivo X200 if you want a screen you can read in sunlight — 4,500 nits vs 2,600 nits.
- Choose Vivo X200 if you want sharper selfies — 32 MP vs 12 MP.
- Choose Vivo X200 if you want longer battery life — 5,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh.
- Choose Vivo X200 if you want faster charging — 90 W vs 45 W.
- Choose Vivo X200 if you want a lower price — 799 USD vs 1,299 USD.
Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want…
- Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want a faster phone for apps and games — 2,200,000 pts vs 2,100,000 pts.
- Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want a bigger screen — 6.9 in vs 6.67 in.
- Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want a sharper screen — 505 ppi vs 460 ppi.
- Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want better video quality — 96 pts vs 92 pts.
- Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want a better camera — 146 pts vs 142 pts.
- Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want the convenience of wireless charging — Yes vs No.
At a glance
- Vivo X200
- Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Click a label to jump to that section ↓
Best price now
The cheap alternative
Full record
Every spec, side by side — winners get a check and a proportional bar. Ties share the badge.
Performance score
Approximate benchmark score of the chipset — higher is faster for apps, games and AI.
Chipset
The processor inside — shown for reference, never decides a winner.
RAM
More RAM keeps more apps alive in the background.
Storage
Base onboard storage for photos, apps and media.
Screen size
Diagonal screen size — bigger is better for media, smaller is easier to hold.
Pixel density
Sharpness of the screen — above ~400 ppi looks crisp.
Refresh rate
How smooth scrolling and motion feel. 120 Hz is the modern standard.
Peak brightness
Peak brightness in sunlight — higher stays readable outdoors.
Main camera
Resolution of the primary rear camera — photo quality is judged by the Camera quality score, not megapixels.
Selfie camera
Resolution of the front camera.
Telephoto
A dedicated zoom lens for distant subjects without quality loss.
Video score
Composite video rating — stabilisation, 4K/8K support and colour.
Camera score
Composite camera quality from independent testing — how good the photos actually are.
Battery
Battery capacity — higher generally lasts longer.
Charging speed
Wired charging speed — higher refills faster.
Wireless charging
Whether the phone charges wirelessly.
Price
Typical MSRP in US dollars — lower is better value.
Which one should you buy?
Vivo X200
Choose Vivo X200 if display matters most — it wins the most categories overall. It costs USD 799, the lowest price in this group.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if performance matters most. It costs USD 1,299.
Pros & cons
Vivo X200
- Dimensity 9400 flagship power
- ZEISS 3x zoom
- 5,800 mAh battery
- Pricey
- No wireless charging
- Software has bloat
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Class-leading performance
- 200 MP main camera with dual telephoto
- S Pen built in
- Very expensive
- Heavy at 218 g
- 45 W charging trails rivals