Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsApple iPhone 16 Pro
SETTLEDUpdated September 8, 2026
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra wins
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra wins 3 of 5 categories — our overall pick
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is the overall winner, taking 3 of 5 categories — performance is its standout. It costs USD 1,299 — USD 300 more than the Apple iPhone 16 Pro. Pay the premium if performance is your priority.
- Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes Performance — led by ram (12 GB).
- Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes Display — led by screen size (6.9 in).
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro takes Camera — led by camera quality (154 pts).
- Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes Battery — led by battery (5,000 mAh).
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro takes Price — led by price (999 USD).
Scores follow our published methodology · v2026.09
Scores follow our published methodology · v2026.09
In plain English
Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want…
- Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want a faster phone for apps and games — 2,200,000 pts vs 1,650,000 pts.
- Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want more apps open at once — 12 GB vs 8 GB.
- Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want more room for photos and apps — 256 GB vs 128 GB.
- Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want a bigger screen — 6.9 in vs 6.3 in.
- Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want a sharper screen — 505 ppi vs 460 ppi.
- Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want a screen you can read in sunlight — 2,600 nits vs 2,000 nits.
- Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want longer battery life — 5,000 mAh vs 3,582 mAh.
- Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want faster charging — 45 W vs 27 W.
Choose Apple iPhone 16 Pro if you want…
- Choose Apple iPhone 16 Pro if you want better video quality — 98 pts vs 96 pts.
- Choose Apple iPhone 16 Pro if you want a better camera — 154 pts vs 146 pts.
- Choose Apple iPhone 16 Pro if you want a lower price — 999 USD vs 1,299 USD.
At a glance
- Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Click a label to jump to that section ↓
Best price now
The cheap alternative
Full record
Every spec, side by side — winners get a check and a proportional bar. Ties share the badge.
Performance score
Approximate benchmark score of the chipset — higher is faster for apps, games and AI.
Chipset
The processor inside — shown for reference, never decides a winner.
RAM
More RAM keeps more apps alive in the background.
Storage
Base onboard storage for photos, apps and media.
Screen size
Diagonal screen size — bigger is better for media, smaller is easier to hold.
Pixel density
Sharpness of the screen — above ~400 ppi looks crisp.
Refresh rate
How smooth scrolling and motion feel. 120 Hz is the modern standard.
Brightness
Peak brightness in sunlight — higher stays readable outdoors.
Main camera
Resolution of the primary rear camera — photo quality is judged by the Camera quality score, not megapixels.
Selfie camera
Resolution of the front camera.
Telephoto lens
A dedicated zoom lens for distant subjects without quality loss.
Video quality
Composite video rating — stabilisation, 4K/8K support and colour.
Camera quality
Composite camera quality from independent testing — how good the photos actually are.
Battery
Battery capacity — higher generally lasts longer.
Charging speed
Wired charging speed — higher refills faster.
Wireless charging
Whether the phone charges wirelessly.
Price
Typical MSRP in US dollars — lower is better value.
Which one should you buy?
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Choose Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if performance matters most — it wins the most categories overall. It costs USD 1,299.
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Choose Apple iPhone 16 Pro if camera matters most. It costs USD 999, the lowest price in this group.
Pros & cons
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Class-leading performance
- 200 MP main camera with dual telephoto
- S Pen built in
- Very expensive
- Heavy at 218 g
- 45 W charging trails rivals
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- A18 Pro performance
- Excellent 4K/120 video
- Premium build
- Pricey
- Battery is modest
- 27 W charging is slow