PhoneCompare.Phones
ENFRعCompare

POCO X6 ProvsRedmi Note 13 Pro 5G

SETTLEDUpdated September 8, 2026

👑 Winner
POCO X6 Pro

Xiaomi

POCO X6 Pro

USD 299

51score

3 of 5 categories won

Settled

POCO X6 Pro wins

Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G

Xiaomi

Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G

USD 279

43score

1 of 5 categories won

Verdict

POCO X6 Pro wins 3 of 5 categories — our overall pick

POCO X6 Pro is the overall winner, 3 / 5 — display is its standout. It costs USD 299 — USD 20 more than the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G. Pay the premium if display is your priority.

  • POCO X6 Pro takes Performance — led by performance score (1,350,000 pts).
  • POCO X6 Pro takes Display — led by peak brightness (1,800 nits).
  • POCO X6 Pro takes Camera — led by video score (87 pts).
  • Too close to call between Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G and POCO X6 Pro.
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G takes Price — led by price (279 USD).

Scores follow our published methodology · v2026.09

In plain English

Choose POCO X6 Pro if you want…

  • Choose POCO X6 Pro if you want a faster phone for apps and games — 1,350,000 pts vs 600,000 pts.
  • Choose POCO X6 Pro if you want a screen you can read in sunlight — 1,800 nits vs 1,300 nits.
  • Choose POCO X6 Pro if you want better video quality — 87 pts vs 84 pts.
  • Choose POCO X6 Pro if you want a better camera — 122 pts vs 116 pts.

Choose Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G if you want…

  • Choose Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G if you want longer battery life — 5,100 mAh vs 5,000 mAh.
  • Choose Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G if you want a lower price — 279 USD vs 299 USD.

At a glance

PerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryPrice
  • POCO X6 Pro
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G

Click a label to jump to that section ↓

Best price now

POCO X6 Pro

USD 299USD 3299%
Buy now →

Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G

USD 279USD 32915%
Buy now →

Full record

Every spec, side by side — winners get a check and a proportional bar. Ties share the badge.

SpecPOCO X6 ProRedmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Performance

Performance score

Approximate benchmark score of the chipset — higher is faster for apps, games and AI.

1,350,000 ptsBEST
600,000 pts

Chipset

The processor inside — shown for reference, never decides a winner.

MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
Snapdragon 7s Gen 2

RAM

More RAM keeps more apps alive in the background.

8 GBBEST
8 GBBEST

Storage

Base onboard storage for photos, apps and media.

256 GBBEST
256 GBBEST
Display

Screen size

Diagonal screen size — bigger is better for media, smaller is easier to hold.

6.67 inBEST
6.67 inBEST

Pixel density

Sharpness of the screen — above ~400 ppi looks crisp.

446 ppiBEST
446 ppiBEST

Refresh rate

How smooth scrolling and motion feel. 120 Hz is the modern standard.

120 HzBEST
120 HzBEST

Peak brightness

Peak brightness in sunlight — higher stays readable outdoors.

1,800 nitsBEST
1,300 nits
Camera

Main camera

Resolution of the primary rear camera — photo quality is judged by the Camera quality score, not megapixels.

64
200

Selfie camera

Resolution of the front camera.

16 MPBEST
16 MPBEST

Telephoto

A dedicated zoom lens for distant subjects without quality loss.

No
No

Video score

Composite video rating — stabilisation, 4K/8K support and colour.

87 ptsBEST
84 pts

Camera score

Composite camera quality from independent testing — how good the photos actually are.

122 ptsBEST
116 pts
Battery

Battery

Battery capacity — higher generally lasts longer.

5,000 mAh
5,100 mAhBEST

Charging speed

Wired charging speed — higher refills faster.

67 WBEST
67 WBEST

Wireless charging

Whether the phone charges wirelessly.

No
No
Price

Price

Typical MSRP in US dollars — lower is better value.

299 USD
279 USDBEST

Which one should you buy?

POCO X6 Pro

Choose POCO X6 Pro if display matters most — it wins the most categories overall. It costs USD 299.

Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G

Choose Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G if price matters most. It costs USD 279, the lowest price in this group.

Pros & cons

POCO X6 Pro

  • Strong chipset for price
  • 67 W charging
  • Cheap
  • Average cameras
  • Plastic build
  • Software ads

Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G

  • 200 MP camera
  • 67 W charging
  • Very affordable
  • Mid-range chipset
  • Software ads
  • No wireless charging