Nothing Phone (2a)vsMotorola Edge 50 Ultra
SETTLEDUpdated September 8, 2026
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra wins
Verdict
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra wins 4 of 5 categories — our overall pick
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is the overall winner, 4 / 5 — battery is its standout. It costs USD 799 — USD 450 more than the Nothing Phone (2a). Pay the premium if battery is your priority.
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes Performance — led by storage (512 GB).
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes Display — led by refresh rate (144 Hz).
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes Camera — led by telephoto (Yes).
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes Battery — led by wireless charging (Yes).
- Nothing Phone (2a) takes Price — led by price (349 USD).
Scores follow our published methodology · v2026.09
In plain English
Choose Nothing Phone (2a) if you want…
- Choose Nothing Phone (2a) if you want longer battery life — 5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh.
- Choose Nothing Phone (2a) if you want a lower price — 349 USD vs 799 USD.
Choose Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you want…
- Choose Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you want a faster phone for apps and games — 1,500,000 pts vs 700,000 pts.
- Choose Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you want more apps open at once — 12 GB vs 8 GB.
- Choose Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you want more room for photos and apps — 512 GB vs 128 GB.
- Choose Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you want a sharper screen — 446 ppi vs 394 ppi.
- Choose Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you want smoother scrolling — 144 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- Choose Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you want a screen you can read in sunlight — 2,500 nits vs 1,300 nits.
- Choose Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you want sharper selfies — 50 MP vs 32 MP.
- Choose Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you want true optical zoom — Yes vs No.
- Choose Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you want better video quality — 93 pts vs 82 pts.
- Choose Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you want a better camera — 130 pts vs 112 pts.
- Choose Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you want faster charging — 125 W vs 45 W.
- Choose Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you want the convenience of wireless charging — Yes vs No.
At a glance
- Nothing Phone (2a)
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Click a label to jump to that section ↓
Best price now
The cheap alternative
Full record
Every spec, side by side — winners get a check and a proportional bar. Ties share the badge.
Performance score
Approximate benchmark score of the chipset — higher is faster for apps, games and AI.
Chipset
The processor inside — shown for reference, never decides a winner.
RAM
More RAM keeps more apps alive in the background.
Storage
Base onboard storage for photos, apps and media.
Screen size
Diagonal screen size — bigger is better for media, smaller is easier to hold.
Pixel density
Sharpness of the screen — above ~400 ppi looks crisp.
Refresh rate
How smooth scrolling and motion feel. 120 Hz is the modern standard.
Peak brightness
Peak brightness in sunlight — higher stays readable outdoors.
Main camera
Resolution of the primary rear camera — photo quality is judged by the Camera quality score, not megapixels.
Selfie camera
Resolution of the front camera.
Telephoto
A dedicated zoom lens for distant subjects without quality loss.
Video score
Composite video rating — stabilisation, 4K/8K support and colour.
Camera score
Composite camera quality from independent testing — how good the photos actually are.
Battery
Battery capacity — higher generally lasts longer.
Charging speed
Wired charging speed — higher refills faster.
Wireless charging
Whether the phone charges wirelessly.
Price
Typical MSRP in US dollars — lower is better value.
Which one should you buy?
Nothing Phone (2a)
Choose Nothing Phone (2a) if price matters most. It costs USD 349, the lowest price in this group.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Choose Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if battery matters most — it wins the most categories overall. It costs USD 799.
Pros & cons
Nothing Phone (2a)
- Unique Glyph design
- Clean software
- Good price
- Mid-range chipset
- No telephoto
- 45 W charging
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
- 125 W charging
- 64 MP telephoto
- Clean Android
- Mid-range chipset
- Average battery
- Camera tuning inconsistent