PhoneCompare.Phones
ENFRعCompare

Honor X9bvsPOCO M6 Pro

SETTLEDUpdated September 8, 2026

👑 Winner
Honor X9b

Honor

Honor X9b

USD 299

41score

2 of 5 categories won

Settled

Honor X9b wins

POCO M6 Pro

Xiaomi

POCO M6 Pro

USD 249

40score

1 of 5 categories won

Verdict

Honor X9b wins 2 of 5 categories — our overall pick

Honor X9b is the overall winner, 2 / 5 — display is its standout. It costs USD 299 — USD 50 more than the POCO M6 Pro. Pay the premium if display is your priority.

  • Honor X9b takes Performance — led by performance score (550,000 pts).
  • Honor X9b takes Display — led by pixel density (431 ppi).
  • Too close to call between Honor X9b and POCO M6 Pro.
  • Too close to call between POCO M6 Pro and Honor X9b.
  • POCO M6 Pro takes Price — led by price (249 USD).

Scores follow our published methodology · v2026.09

In plain English

Choose Honor X9b if you want…

  • Choose Honor X9b if you want a faster phone for apps and games — 550,000 pts vs 400,000 pts.
  • Choose Honor X9b if you want a bigger screen — 6.78 in vs 6.67 in.
  • Choose Honor X9b if you want a sharper screen — 431 ppi vs 395 ppi.
  • Choose Honor X9b if you want a better camera — 112 pts vs 110 pts.
  • Choose Honor X9b if you want longer battery life — 5,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh.

Choose POCO M6 Pro if you want…

  • Choose POCO M6 Pro if you want a screen you can read in sunlight — 1,300 nits vs 1,200 nits.
  • Choose POCO M6 Pro if you want faster charging — 67 W vs 35 W.
  • Choose POCO M6 Pro if you want a lower price — 249 USD vs 299 USD.

At a glance

PerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryPrice
  • Honor X9b
  • POCO M6 Pro

Click a label to jump to that section ↓

Best price now

Honor X9b

USD 299USD 34914%
Buy now →

POCO M6 Pro

USD 249USD 29917%
Buy now →

The cheap alternative

POCO M6 Pro

POCO M6 Pro

USD 249

17%Buy now →

Full record

Every spec, side by side — winners get a check and a proportional bar. Ties share the badge.

SpecHonor X9bPOCO M6 Pro
Performance

Performance score

Approximate benchmark score of the chipset — higher is faster for apps, games and AI.

550,000 ptsBEST
400,000 pts

Chipset

The processor inside — shown for reference, never decides a winner.

Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra

RAM

More RAM keeps more apps alive in the background.

8 GBBEST
8 GBBEST

Storage

Base onboard storage for photos, apps and media.

256 GBBEST
256 GBBEST
Display

Screen size

Diagonal screen size — bigger is better for media, smaller is easier to hold.

6.78 inBEST
6.67 in

Pixel density

Sharpness of the screen — above ~400 ppi looks crisp.

431 ppiBEST
395 ppi

Refresh rate

How smooth scrolling and motion feel. 120 Hz is the modern standard.

120 HzBEST
120 HzBEST

Peak brightness

Peak brightness in sunlight — higher stays readable outdoors.

1,200 nits
1,300 nitsBEST
Camera

Main camera

Resolution of the primary rear camera — photo quality is judged by the Camera quality score, not megapixels.

108
64

Selfie camera

Resolution of the front camera.

16 MPBEST
16 MPBEST

Telephoto

A dedicated zoom lens for distant subjects without quality loss.

No
No

Video score

Composite video rating — stabilisation, 4K/8K support and colour.

86 ptsBEST
86 ptsBEST

Camera score

Composite camera quality from independent testing — how good the photos actually are.

112 ptsBEST
110 pts
Battery

Battery

Battery capacity — higher generally lasts longer.

5,800 mAhBEST
5,000 mAh

Charging speed

Wired charging speed — higher refills faster.

35 W
67 WBEST

Wireless charging

Whether the phone charges wirelessly.

No
No
Price

Price

Typical MSRP in US dollars — lower is better value.

299 USD
249 USDBEST

Which one should you buy?

Honor X9b

Choose Honor X9b if display matters most — it wins the most categories overall. It costs USD 299.

POCO M6 Pro

Choose POCO M6 Pro if price matters most. It costs USD 249, the lowest price in this group.

Pros & cons

Honor X9b

  • Durable build
  • 5,800 mAh battery
  • Curved display
  • Slow chipset
  • 35 W charging
  • Average cameras

POCO M6 Pro

  • 120 Hz AMOLED
  • OIS camera
  • 67 W charging
  • Slow chipset
  • Software ads
  • No ultrawide