Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldvsRealme C67
SETTLEDUpdated September 8, 2026
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold wins
Verdict
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold wins 4 of 5 categories — our overall pick
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is the overall winner, 4 / 5 — camera is its standout. It costs USD 1,799 — USD 1,630 more than the Realme C67. Pay the premium if camera is your priority.
- Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold takes Performance — led by ram (16 GB).
- Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold takes Display — led by peak brightness (2,700 nits).
- Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold takes Camera — led by telephoto (Yes).
- Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold takes Battery — led by wireless charging (Yes).
- Realme C67 takes Price — led by price (169 USD).
Scores follow our published methodology · v2026.09
In plain English
Choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you want…
- Choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you want a faster phone for apps and games — 1,150,000 pts vs 380,000 pts.
- Choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you want more apps open at once — 16 GB vs 8 GB.
- Choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you want more room for photos and apps — 256 GB vs 128 GB.
- Choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you want a bigger screen — 8 in vs 6.72 in.
- Choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you want smoother scrolling — 120 Hz vs 90 Hz.
- Choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you want a screen you can read in sunlight — 2,700 nits vs 550 nits.
- Choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you want sharper selfies — 10 MP vs 8 MP.
- Choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you want true optical zoom — Yes vs No.
- Choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you want better video quality — 92 pts vs 48 pts.
- Choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you want a better camera — 136 pts vs 82 pts.
- Choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if you want the convenience of wireless charging — Yes vs No.
Choose Realme C67 if you want…
- Choose Realme C67 if you want a sharper screen — 392 ppi vs 373 ppi.
- Choose Realme C67 if you want longer battery life — 5,000 mAh vs 4,650 mAh.
- Choose Realme C67 if you want faster charging — 33 W vs 21 W.
- Choose Realme C67 if you want a lower price — 169 USD vs 1,799 USD.
At a glance
- Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Realme C67
Click a label to jump to that section ↓
Best price now
The cheap alternative
Full record
Every spec, side by side — winners get a check and a proportional bar. Ties share the badge.
Performance score
Approximate benchmark score of the chipset — higher is faster for apps, games and AI.
Chipset
The processor inside — shown for reference, never decides a winner.
RAM
More RAM keeps more apps alive in the background.
Storage
Base onboard storage for photos, apps and media.
Screen size
Diagonal screen size — bigger is better for media, smaller is easier to hold.
Pixel density
Sharpness of the screen — above ~400 ppi looks crisp.
Refresh rate
How smooth scrolling and motion feel. 120 Hz is the modern standard.
Peak brightness
Peak brightness in sunlight — higher stays readable outdoors.
Main camera
Resolution of the primary rear camera — photo quality is judged by the Camera quality score, not megapixels.
Selfie camera
Resolution of the front camera.
Telephoto
A dedicated zoom lens for distant subjects without quality loss.
Video score
Composite video rating — stabilisation, 4K/8K support and colour.
Camera score
Composite camera quality from independent testing — how good the photos actually are.
Battery
Battery capacity — higher generally lasts longer.
Charging speed
Wired charging speed — higher refills faster.
Wireless charging
Whether the phone charges wirelessly.
Price
Typical MSRP in US dollars — lower is better value.
Which one should you buy?
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold if camera matters most — it wins the most categories overall. It costs USD 1,799.
Realme C67
Choose Realme C67 if price matters most. It costs USD 169, the lowest price in this group.
Pros & cons
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Big 8-inch inner display
- Excellent cameras
- 7 years of updates
- Very expensive
- Slow charging
- Tensor G4 trails rivals
Realme C67
- 108 MP main camera
- Big 90 Hz display
- Clean look
- Snapdragon 685 is dated
- No 5G
- Slow 33 W charging