PhoneCompare.Phones
ENFRعCompare

CMF Phone 1vsMotorola Moto G54

SETTLEDUpdated September 8, 2026

👑 Winner
CMF Phone 1

Nothing

CMF Phone 1

USD 199

39score

2 of 5 categories won

Settled

CMF Phone 1 wins

Motorola Moto G54

Motorola

Motorola Moto G54

USD 199

36score

0 of 5 categories won

No category wins

Verdict

CMF Phone 1 wins 2 of 5 categories — our overall pick

CMF Phone 1 is the overall winner, 2 / 5 — price is its standout. At USD 199, it's also the most affordable of this group.

  • CMF Phone 1 takes Performance — led by performance score (650,000 pts).
  • CMF Phone 1 takes Display — led by peak brightness (2,000 nits).
  • Too close to call between Motorola Moto G54 and CMF Phone 1.
  • Too close to call between CMF Phone 1 and Motorola Moto G54.
  • Too close to call between CMF Phone 1 and Motorola Moto G54.

Scores follow our published methodology · v2026.09

In plain English

Choose CMF Phone 1 if you want…

  • Choose CMF Phone 1 if you want a faster phone for apps and games — 650,000 pts vs 480,000 pts.
  • Choose CMF Phone 1 if you want a bigger screen — 6.67 in vs 6.5 in.
  • Choose CMF Phone 1 if you want a screen you can read in sunlight — 2,000 nits vs 1,000 nits.
  • Choose CMF Phone 1 if you want a better camera — 114 pts vs 110 pts.

Choose Motorola Moto G54 if you want…

  • Choose Motorola Moto G54 if you want a sharper screen — 402 ppi vs 395 ppi.
  • Choose Motorola Moto G54 if you want better video quality — 86 pts vs 83 pts.

At a glance

PerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryPrice
  • CMF Phone 1
  • Motorola Moto G54

Click a label to jump to that section ↓

Best price now

CMF Phone 1

USD 199USD 24920%
Buy now →

Motorola Moto G54

USD 199USD 24920%
Buy now →

Full record

Every spec, side by side — winners get a check and a proportional bar. Ties share the badge.

SpecCMF Phone 1Motorola Moto G54
Performance

Performance score

Approximate benchmark score of the chipset — higher is faster for apps, games and AI.

650,000 ptsBEST
480,000 pts

Chipset

The processor inside — shown for reference, never decides a winner.

MediaTek Dimensity 7300
MediaTek Dimensity 7020

RAM

More RAM keeps more apps alive in the background.

8 GBBEST
8 GBBEST

Storage

Base onboard storage for photos, apps and media.

128 GBBEST
128 GBBEST
Display

Screen size

Diagonal screen size — bigger is better for media, smaller is easier to hold.

6.67 inBEST
6.5 in

Pixel density

Sharpness of the screen — above ~400 ppi looks crisp.

395 ppi
402 ppiBEST

Refresh rate

How smooth scrolling and motion feel. 120 Hz is the modern standard.

120 HzBEST
120 HzBEST

Peak brightness

Peak brightness in sunlight — higher stays readable outdoors.

2,000 nitsBEST
1,000 nits
Camera

Main camera

Resolution of the primary rear camera — photo quality is judged by the Camera quality score, not megapixels.

50
50

Selfie camera

Resolution of the front camera.

16 MPBEST
16 MPBEST

Telephoto

A dedicated zoom lens for distant subjects without quality loss.

No
No

Video score

Composite video rating — stabilisation, 4K/8K support and colour.

83 pts
86 ptsBEST

Camera score

Composite camera quality from independent testing — how good the photos actually are.

114 ptsBEST
110 pts
Battery

Battery

Battery capacity — higher generally lasts longer.

5,000 mAhBEST
5,000 mAhBEST

Charging speed

Wired charging speed — higher refills faster.

33 WBEST
33 WBEST

Wireless charging

Whether the phone charges wirelessly.

No
No
Price

Price

Typical MSRP in US dollars — lower is better value.

199 USDBEST
199 USDBEST

Which one should you buy?

CMF Phone 1

Choose CMF Phone 1 if price matters most — it wins the most categories overall. It costs USD 199, the lowest price in this group.

Motorola Moto G54

Choose Motorola Moto G54 if price matters most. It costs USD 199.

Pros & cons

CMF Phone 1

  • Swappable back design
  • 120 Hz AMOLED
  • Very affordable
  • Slow charging
  • Average cameras
  • No NFC in some markets

Motorola Moto G54

  • 120 Hz display
  • 5,000 mAh battery
  • Clean Android
  • Slow chipset
  • 33 W charging
  • Average cameras